Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gavin Van Peperzeel vs Calum Puttergill Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peperzeel vs Puttergill analysis and find out who is favored!
Gavin Van Peperzeel vs Calum Puttergill Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Peperzeel 1 - 0 Puttergill
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peperzeel has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Puttergill has won 46.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peperzeel, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Puttergill has won 53.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peperzeel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Puttergill has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peperzeel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Puttergill winning 33.33% (W/L 9/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peperzeel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 114/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 38/ 34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peperzeel winning 1 times and Puttergill being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Peperzeel winning 2 and Puttergill winning 0. The last match between Peperzeel and Puttergill was at the Australia F3, 14-03-2016, First, Clay with Gavin Van Peperzeel getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peperzeel and Puttergill have played a deciding set 0 times, with Peperzeel winning 0 times and Puttergill 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peperzeel winning 0, and Puttergill 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peperzeel has played against opponents with an average rank of while Puttergill has played against players with an average rank of 187.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peperzeel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Puttergill has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peperzeel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Puttergill has converted 54.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
251
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
888
Rank
663
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
58% (230-164)
Career Total W/L
49% (170-174)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
38% (3-5)
$720
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Peperzeel VS Puttergill H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Gavin Van Peperzeel | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:0 | 1:33:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (41/68) | 60% (35/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (32/41) | 49% (17/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (13/27) | 70% (16/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (25/58) | 34% (23/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Peperzeel VS Puttergill H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Calum Puttergill
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gavin Van Peperzeel | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (9/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (82/94) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 129.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (339/548) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (219/339) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (97/209) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 54% (25/46) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (227/559) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Gavin Van Peperzeel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Look
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
33 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
5
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
5
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Edward Bourchier
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Vuradin
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
53 of
73)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Renta Tokuda
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Ken Onishi
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
77%
(
95 of
123)
14
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
59 of
95)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
123)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Harris
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-7(7) 7-6(4) 7-6(5) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Calum Puttergill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Calum Puttergill
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Moerani Bouzige
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kokoro Isomura
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Calum Puttergill
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Preston Brown
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Peperzeel Vs Puttergill Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
